INSTANT RUN-OFF VOTING (IRV)

Instant runoff voting (IRV) lets voters specify preferences for multiple candidates running for the same office.  IRV allows for better voter choice and wider voter participation by accommodating multiple candidates in single seat races and eliminating a "spoiler effect."

 IRV allows voters to vote for their favorite candidate without fear of helping elect their least favorite candidate, and it ensures that the winner enjoys true support from a majority of the voters. It is attractive because it ensures that the eventual winner will be the choice of a majority of voters, rather than just a plurality.

 For example, in 2000 if no Presidential candidate won an absolute majority (more than 50%) in a state the lowest vote getter would be eliminated and that candidate's voters' second-ranked choices would receive their votes instead.  Under IRV, many of Ralph Nader's votes may have listed Al Gore as their second choice and in final tabulation if Nader did not have enough votes to win then his votes would may have wound up going to Gore.

 IRV changes the tone of elections from negative sound-bites to positive messages aimed beyond one's base, since candidates need to pick up second or third choice votes in order to win; and because it saves the expense and avoids the lower turnout associated with delayed runoff elections.

 Howard Dean supports IRV. On June 3rd at the 2005 “Take Back America” Conference held in Washington D.C., Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean encouraged the adoption of instant runoff voting (IRV) as a way to assure majority winners and increase voter turnout.  Said Dean, “I think we ought to have instant runoff voting.  I think that brings people in to the polls.  If there's a third party, fine.  They get a choice.  We get majorities that win, and it brings more people in.”

 Presidential candidate in 1980 and FairVote Board chair John B. Anderson supports IRV. “The American people want choices at the polls. We need leaders from across the spectrum to work together to ensure voters have those choices and ensure winners have majority support.”  

The California Democratic Party adopted a platform recommending IRV. And San Francisco recently used IRV in their Board of Supervisors election and voters have adopted it in cities in Michigan, Vermont and Carbondale, Colorado.  

 ###

 How Instant Runoff Voting Works:

 IRV allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference (i.e. first choice, second choice, third, fourth and so on). Voters have the option to rank as many or as few candidates as they wish, but can vote without fear that ranking less favored candidates will harm the chances of their most preferred candidates. First choices are then tabulated, and if a candidate receives a majority of first choices, he or she is elected. If nobody has a clear majority of votes on the first count, a series of runoffs are simulated, using each voter’s preferences indicated on the ballot. The candidate who received the fewest first place choices is eliminated. All ballots are then retabulated, with each ballot counting as one vote for each voter's highest ranked candidate who has not been eliminated. Specifically, voters who chose the now-eliminated candidate will now have their ballots counted for their second choice candidate -- just as if they were voting in a traditional two-round runoff election -- but all other voters get to continue supporting their top candidate. The weakest candidates are successively eliminated and their voters' ballots are redistributed to next choices until a candidate crosses a majority of votes.

 More information on instant runoff voting is available at www.fairvote.org.  

BACK TO IRV homepage

###