[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[discuss-dan] Fwd: ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION, ONE YEAR LATER
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 11:14:44 -0700
- From: Persephone Moonshadow Howling Womyn <moonshadow@persephone.org>
- Subject: [discuss-dan] Fwd: ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION, ONE YEAR LATER
>To: americanlands-list@igc.topica.com
>From: Steve Holmer <wafcdc@americanlands.org>
>Subject: ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION, ONE YEAR LATER
>Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 14:02:28 -0800
>
>To: All Activists
>From: Jim Jontz
>Date: December 8, 2000
>
>ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION, ONE YEAR LATER
>
>Last week marked the anniversary of the WTO Ministerial meeting in
>Seattle WA that drew the attention of observers around the world to the
>forces in the global economy that threaten workers, the environment, and
>human rights. Thousands of citizens marched in the streets of Seattle,
>"Teamsters and Turtles, together at last," and when the global trade
>ministers ended their talks, plans of the WTO's leaders (including the
>"Global Free Logging Agreement" pushed by the U.S.) were left in the
>dust.
>
>Where are we, one year later? Although WTO nations are still arguing
>among themselves about blame for the events in Seattle, the action in
>the global trade arena has shifted elsewhere. The U.S. and Chile
>announced plans recently to begin negotiations next month on a
>"bilateral" trade agreement that will surely be a concern to forest
>activists because of the vulnerability of Chile's forests to U.S.
>logging companies. The Cascada project by Boise Cascade to build the
>world's largest chip mill in the midst of the Chilean rainforest region
>is testimony to what "free" trade and investment means to forests.
>
>The bigger issue, however, is a hemispheric trade agreement that would
>extend NAFTA to virtually all nations of the Western hemisphere, the
>Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). Both George Bush and Al Gore
>support the FTAA. There has been virtually no public discussion of it,
>and no text of the agreement being negotiated has been made available to
>the public. What we do know, however, is that the FTAA became much more
>important after Seattle when the U.S. adopted a strategy of using the
>FTAA to win various provisions that could then be taken back to the WTO
>and leveraged into a global trade and investment deal. The investment
>protection provisions likely to be included in the FTAA are by
>themselves ample reason to alarm environmental, human rights, and
>workers advocates. Under NAFTA, companies have the right to sue
>national governments when regulations adversely affect their
>investments. This "regulatory takings" provision has already been used
>by the Ethyl Corporation to win damages from Canada, and the Metalclad
>Company to win damages from Mexico.
>
>The U.S. Congress will likely be asked to give "Fast Track" authority to
>the next President (Bush or Gore), approving the same process used to
>consider NAFTA and GATT in which the Congress in essence writes a "blank
>check" to the new Administration to negotiate trade deals, and then
>agrees not to seek amendments of any new agreements, but only consider
>them with an "up or down" vote. The debate over Fast Track will be one
>of the most important opportunities that forest and other environmental
>advocates have to influence the direction of our nation's trade policy.
>
>Ironically, one of the most important impacts of the "Battle of Seattle"
>may have been to globalize the perspective of citizens around the world
>— especially those of us in the U.S. — and help us understand how our
>struggles are linked to those of others. Will that understanding inform
>our actions, as we enter a New Year and make plans for what, and how we
>do our work? The answer to that question, more than any other, may
>determine whether the events of Seattle a year ago will have a lasting
>impact.
>Steve Holmer
>Campaign Coordinator
>American Lands
>726 7th Street SE
>Washington, D.C. 20003
>202/547-9105
>202/547-9213 fax
>mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org
>http://www.americanlands.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe please send a message to
>mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org
>..............
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/_/_/976385691/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
discuss-dan-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Contact the webmaster for comments and questions.
Denver Green Party|Colorado Nader 2000