s/r home  | issues  | authors  | 17 contents

Synthesis/Regeneration 17   (Fall 1998)


Proposed General Assembly Resolution to be circulated to governments by their citizens

Citizens' Alternative Treaty to the Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI)


[Introduction. The proposed treaty below has been circulated internationally as an alternative to the MAI. It has been translated into Spanish, and is being translated into French. It was endorsed at a recent meeting of the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas, sent several times to the UN Missions in New York, and to the international media. It will be recirculated to the UN on October 24, 1998 and on the 50th Anniversary of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights on December 10, 1998. The treaty is supported by a body of international documents and principles drawn from over 50 years of international obligations, commitments and expectations created through the UN system. The Annex contains the documents that have been reviewed for the drafting of this resolutiont and is supported by the Charter of Obligations prepared by the Global Compliance Research Project.
-- Joan Russow, Ph.D., National Leader, Green Party of Canada]




Through more than 50 years of concerted effort, the member states of the United Nations have created public trust international obligations, commitments and expectations in which they have undertaken the following:

Concerned that trade organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), and trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI) undermine the work of over 50 years in creating obligations, commitments and expectations with respect to the matters set out above;


...trade agreements such as NAFTA and the Multilateral Agreement on Investments undermine the work of over 50 years in creating obligations, commitments and expectations.

Dismayed by the continued global urgency resulting from the failure of member states of the United Nations to discharge their obligations from conventions, treaties and covenants, to act on commitments from conference action plans, and to fulfill expectations from General Assembly resolutions;

Recalling the commitment made by all the member states of the United Nations in the Platform of Action at the UN Conference on Women: Equality, Development and Peace (Beijing, 1995) and in the Habitat II Agenda, "to ensure that corporations including transnational corporations comply with national codes, social security laws, and international law, including international environmental law;"

We, the member states of the United Nations, undertake the following:

1. To discharge obligations, act on commitments, and fulfill expectations arising from Public Trust international agreements and thus:

2. To establish mandatory international standards and regulations (MINS) based on international principles and on the highest and strongest regulations from member states, harmonizing standards and regulations continually upwards with respect to:


To demand compensation and reparations from corporations, and from administrations that have permitted corporations to, or assisted them in, degrading the environment or violating fundamental human rights...

a. Promoting and fully guaranteeing respect for human rights, labor rights and social justice; b. Enabling socially equitable and environmentally sound employment; c. Achieving a state of peace, justice and security; d. Creating a global structure that respects the rule of law; and e. Ensuring the preservation and protection of the environment.

3. To demand compensation and reparations from corporations, and from administrations that have permitted corporations to, or assisted them in, degrading the environment or violating fundamental human rights, especially where those actions occurred: a. in developed and developing countries, or b. on the lands of indigenous peoples or in the communities of marginalized citizens in either developing or developed countries;

4. To revoke the licenses and charters of corporations, including transnational corporations, if those corporations have persistently:

5. To reduce the global military budgets by at least 50% and use the savings:

6. To increase funding for United Nations agencies and for international, national and regional educational institutions so that their missions will not be undermined by corporate direction or control; (All funding to the United Nations should be conditional and dedicated to the furthering of international public trust law, not vested interest economic agreements such as GATT, WTO, MAI etc. Given that the Security Council is controlled by the nuclear armed states, the Security Council should be disbanded, and rotational councils should be selected from the membership of the General Assembly.)

7. To develop criteria for partnership with the United Nations so as to ensure the exclusion of corporations from such a partnership if in any part of their operation they have violated human rights, including labor rights, caused environmental degradation, contributed to war and conflict, or failed to promote socially equitable and environmentally sound development;

8. To distinguish "civil society" from the "market," and to define civil society as those elements of society that serve to guarantee human rights, foster justice, protect and conserve the environment, prevent war and conflict, and provide for socially equitable and environmentally sound development;


To prevent the transfer to other states of substances and activities that cause environmental degradation or that are harmful to human health..

9. To prevent the transfer to other states of substances and activities that cause environmental degradation or that are harmful to human health, as agreed in the Rio Declaration; this prohibition would cover activities such as those related to:




To ensure that no state relaxes environmental, health, human rights or labor standards in order to attract industry...

10. To act upon the commitment made at recent United Nations Conferences to move away from the overconsumptive model of development, to reduce the ecological footprint, and to reject the economic dogma that maximum economic growth will resolve the urgency of the global situation;

11. To prohibit all trade zones that have the effect of circumventing obligations and commitments intended to guarantee human rights, including social justice and labor rights, or to protect, preserve and conserve the environment.

12. To work with banking and finance institutions to terminate all Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) which prescribe:

13. To ensure that no state relaxes environmental, health, human rights or labor standards in order to attract industry, and that no corporation allows a branch or subsidiary to engage in:

14. To ensure that no state shall justify trade with a country that violates human rights on the grounds that such trade will lead to a betterment of human rights.

15. To establish an International Court of Compliance where citizens can bring evidence of state and corporate non-compliance with all states' overriding obligations and commitments to:

16. To ensure the right of citizens to sue corporate owners and officers, in criminal and civil court, for any legal violation of human rights, including labor rights, denying social justice, for destroying the environment, for causing serious harm to human health, or for contributing to devastation through arms trade.




Contacts: Joan Russow, National Leader, Green Party of Canada, Co-ordinator, Global Compliance Research Project, 1230 St. Patrick St. Victoria, B.C. V8S 4Y4 Tel/FAX (250) 598-0071, jrussow@coastnet.com; Caspar Davis (L.L.B) prana@coastnet.com





Synthesis/Regeneration home page | S/R 17 Contents